WebFeb 27, 2024 · Slip Op. 23-24 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE Before: Leo M. Gordon, Judge Court No. 20-00124 ... 33 CIT 90, 97, 601 F. Supp. 2d 1347, 1353–54 (2009), aff’d, 592 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2010). Despite its name, the statutory presumption of correctness is not a true evidentiary .
Did you know?
WebSlip Op. 22- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE ETEROS TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC. Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Before: Judge Gary S. Katzmann Court No. 21-00287 OPINION [The court grants Eteros’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and denies the United States’ Cross-Motion for Judgment on the … WebMar 7, 2024 · Stupp I, 43 CIT at __, Slip Op. 19-2 at 17 n.18. A motion for reconsideration is not an opportunity for SeAH to relitigate a previously addressed issue. Consol. Court No. 15-00334 Page 7 statutory purpose, and there is substantial evidence …
WebSlip Op. 21-49 (April 29, 2024), CIT Court No. 18-00191 FINAL RESULTS OF REDETERMINATION PURSUANT TO REMAND ORDER I. SUMMARY The Department of Commerce (Commerce) has prepared these final results of redetermination pursuant to the United States Court of International Trade’s (CIT or the Court) WebSlip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE RISEN ENERGY CO., LTD., Plaintiff, JINGAO SOLAR CO., LTD., ET AL., Consolidated Plaintiffs, SHANGHAI BYD CO ...
WebSlip Op. 22- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN RE SECTION 301 CASES Before: Mark A. Barnett, Claire R. Kelly, and ... claims as non-justiciable pursuant to U.S. Court of International Trade (“USCIT”) Rule 12(b)(6) or, alternatively, for judgment on the agency record pursuant to USCIT Rule 56.1. Defs.’ WebApr 11, 2024 · Slip Op. 23-47 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE KEIRTON USA, INC., Plaintiff, v. Before: Claire R. Kelly, Judge Court No. 21-00452 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER [Denying plaintiff’s application for attorney fees and other expenses incurred in its action against the United States for excluding its …
WebAug 2, 2024 · Slip Op. 17-96 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THE GERSON COMPANY, Plaintiff, Before: Timothy C. Stanceu, Chief Judge v. Court No. 11-00225 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Determining, upon cross-motions for summary judgment, the tariff classification of certain imported candle-like articles …
WebMay 12, 2024 · Risen Energy Co. v. United States, No. 20-03912 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2024) Annotate this Case. Download PDF. bing home screenWebU.S. Court of International Trade Slip Op. 15–47 US MAGNESIUM LLC, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and TIANJIN MAGNESIUM INTERNATIONAL CO., LTD., … bing home page turn off newsWebUnited States Court of International Trade Hon. Mark A. Barnett • Chief Judge Mario Toscano • Clerk of the Court cz usa wingshooterWebMar 23, 2016 · Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co. v. United States, No. 14-00287 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2016) case opinion from the US Court of International Trade cz usa vz58 receiver wearWebU.S. Court of International Trade Slip Op. 15–71 CHANGZHOU HAWD FLOORING CO., LTD., ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. Before: Donald C. Pogue, … cz usa teal over \\u0026 under shotgunWebInj. Order and Op., Invenergy Renewables LLC v. United States, 43 CIT __, __, Slip Op. No. 19–00153 (Dec. 5, 2024), ECF No. 113 (“PI”), the court now returns to a challenge to an agency action taken by the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) regarding the exclusion of safeguard duties on bifacial solar panels ... bing home quizzes wombat 12WebDec 21, 2006 · AQUILINO, Senior Judge. Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint for lack of subject-matter juris-diction having been denied by the court in slip opinion 03-148, 27 CIT 1703, 293 F.Supp.2d 1360 (2003), reh'g denied (Nov. 18, 2004), familiarity with which is presumed, the parties have now interposed cross-motions for … czu water heater